Author:
Giannotti Nicola,Taba Seyedamir Tavakoli,Gureyev Timur,Lewis Sarah,Brombal Luca,Longo Renata,Donato Sandro,Tromba Giuliana,Pena Lucia Arana,Hausermann Daniel,Hall Chris,Maksimenko Anton,Arhatari Benedicta,Nesterets Yakov,Brennan Patrick
Abstract
AbstractRationale and objectivesBreast cancer represents the leading cause of death from cancer in women worldwide. Early detection of breast tumours improves the prognosis and survival rate. Propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography (PB-CT) is a technique that uses refraction and absorption of the X-ray to produce images for clinical applications. This study compared the performance of photon-counting and flat-panel X-ray detectors in PB-CT breast imaging using synchrotron radiation.Materials and methodsMastectomy specimens underwent PB-CT imaging using the Hamamatsu C10900D Flat Panel and PIXIRAD-8 CdTe single-photon-counting detectors. PB-CT images generated at different imaging conditions were compared to absorption-based CT (AB-CT) reference images acquired with the same detectors to investigate the image quality improvement delivered by PB-CT relative to AB-CT. The image quality of the different image sets was assessed by eleven readers in a visual grading characteristics (VGC) study.ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient showed a moderate/good interobserver agreement for the image set analysed (ICC = 0.626, p = <0.001). The area under the curve showed that the image quality improvement in PB-CT images obtained by the PIXIRAD-8 CdTe single-photon-counting detector were consistently higher than the one for flat-panel Hamamatsu detector. The level of improvement in image quality was more substantial at lower radiation doses.ConclusionIn this study, the PIXIRAD-8 photon-counting detector was associated with higher image quality scores at all tested radiation dose levels, which was likely a result of the combined effect of the absence of dark current noise and better spatial resolution, compared to the flat-panel detector.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory