Views and experiences of Every Mind Matters, Public Health England’s adult mental health literacy campaign: a qualitative interview study

Author:

Stuart RuthORCID,Shah PrishaORCID,Olive Rachel RowanORCID,Trevillion KyleeORCID,Henderson ClaireORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEvery Mind Matters is a publicly funded health campaign, launched in England in 2019, to equip adults to look after their mental health, and that of others, by offering online information about common problems: anxiety, low mood, sleep, stress. This study is one component of an independent evaluation of Every Mind Matters conducted by the NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit. Its aim is to explore individuals’ experiences and views of the Every Mind Matters campaign and website.MethodsFour researchers, including three with lived experience of using mental health services, conducted 20, one-off, semi-structured, online interviews with a range of adult participants, including a sample of EMM users and a purposively recruited sub-sample known to have severe or long-term mental health conditions. The team took a codebook approach to the analysis of the transcripts and identified four main themes.FindingsThere was an expectation from the name Every Mind Matters that its advice would address everyone. Almost all participants had experience of mental distress and looked to Every Mind Matters for help with a current problem for themselves.All participants were complimentary about the Every Mind Matters website and found it to be user-friendly (theme 1) and personalised (theme 2) especially the interactive feature ‘Your Mind Plan quiz’ which responds with suggested actions to improve wellbeing and follows up with reminder emails. A few participants found this life changing.Some participants wanted Every Mind Matters to better acknowledge the contexts in which they live (theme 3) such as the limitations of health conditions and health services, and difficulties of crowded housing, social policy, and climate change. Many participants would like Every Mind Matters to do more (theme 4), offer more interactivity, more choice, more information about available treatments, and more stratified advice to cover more severe mental health conditions so that everyone is included.ConclusionThe population that experiences common mental health difficulties is not separate from the population that has severe mental health problems. Every Mind Matters could continue and build on its success by addressing a wider range of needs.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference19 articles.

1. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013

2. McManus S , Bebbington P , Jenkins R , Brugha T. Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014 Executive Summary. Executive Summary. Leeds: NatCen Social Research in collaboration with the University of Leicester, commissioned by NHS Digital fbDoH; 2014 2016.

3. Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

4. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population;The Lancet Psychiatry,2020

5. Mental health literacy: a survey of the public’s ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment;MedJAust,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3