Comparisons of healthcare resource utilisation and costs between Brugada syndrome and congenital long QT syndrome: a territory-wide study

Author:

Lee Sharen,Chung Cheuk To,Radford Danny,Chou Oscar Hou In,Lee Teddy Tai Loy,Leung Keith Sai Kit,Roever Leonardo,Rajan Rajesh,Bazoukis George,Letsas Konstantinos P,Zeng Shaoying,Liu Fang Zhou,Wong Wing Tak,Liu Tong,Tse GaryORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionHealthcare resource utilisation and costs are important metrics of healthcare burden, but they have rarely been explored in the setting of cardiac ion channelopathies.PurposeThe aim of this study is to compare HCRUs and costs between patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) and congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) in a single city of China.MethodsThis was a territory-wide retrospective cohort study of consecutive BrS and LQTS patients at public hospitals or clinics in Hong Kong, China. HCRUs and costs (in USD) for accident and emergency (A&E), inpatient, general outpatient and specialist outpatient attendances were analysed over a 19-year period (2001-2019) at the cohort level. Comparisons were made between BrS and LQTS cohorts using incidence rate ratios (IRRs [95% confidence intervals]).ResultsOver the 19-year study period, 516 BrS (median age of initial presentation: 51 [interquartile range: 38-61] years, 92% male) and 134 LQTS (median age of initial presentation: 21 [9-44] years, 32% male) patients were included. BrS patients had lower total costs compared to LQTS patients (2,008,126 [2,007,622-2,008,629] vs. 2,343,864 [2,342,828-2,344,900]; IRR: 0.857 [0.855-0.858]). For specific attendance types, BrS patients had higher costs for A&E attendances (83,113 [83,048-83,177] vs. 70,604 [70,487-70,721]; IRR: 1.177 [1.165-1.189]) and general outpatient services (2,176 [2,166-2,187] vs. 921 [908-935]; IRR: 2.363 [2.187-2.552]). However, they had lower costs for inpatient stay (1,391,624 [1,391,359-1,391,889] vs. 1,713,742 [1,713,166-1,714,319]; IRR: 0.812 [0.810-0.814]) and to a smaller extent, lower costs for specialist outpatient services (531213 [531049-531376] vs. 558597 [558268-558926]; IRR: 0.951 [0.947-0.9550]) compared to LQTS patients.ConclusionOverall, BrS patients consume 14% less healthcare resources compared to LQTS patients in terms of attendance costs. BrS patients require more A&E and general outpatient services, but less inpatient and specialist outpatient services than LQTS patients. Further studies are needed to examine patient-based attendances and costs to identify subgroups of high HCRU users for both cohorts.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference26 articles.

1. Emerging Arrhythmic Risk of Autoimmune and Inflammatory Cardiac Channelopathies;J Am Heart Assoc,2018

2. Electrophysiological characterization of a large set of novel variants in the SCN5A-gene: identification of novel LQTS3 and BrS mutations;Pflugers Arch,2016

3. Recent understanding of clinical sequencing and gene-based risk stratification in inherited primary arrhythmia syndrome;J Cardiol,2019

4. Current Controversies and Challenges in Brugada Syndrome;Eur Cardiol,2019

5. Prognosis, risk stratification, and management of asymptomatic individuals with Brugada syndrome: A systematic review;Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3