Eccentric cycling involves greater mental demand and cortical activation of the frontoparietal network

Author:

Borot Lénaic,Pageaux BenjaminORCID,Laroche DavyORCID,Vergotte GrégoireORCID,Lepers RomualdORCID,Perrey StéphaneORCID

Abstract

AbstractEccentric, compared to concentric exercise, is thought to be attributed to different strategies of neuro-motor processing and a higher level of mental demand. This study aimed to evaluate the mental demand and related-cortical activation patterns to eccentric and concentric cycling at matched perceived effort and torque. Nineteen men (30 ± 6 yrs) performed four different 5-min cycling exercise conditions on a semi-recumbent isokinetic cycle ergometer: 1) concentric at a moderate perceived effort (23 on the CR100®scale) without torque feedback; 2) concentric and 3) eccentric at the same average torque produced in the first condition; and 4) eccentric at the same moderate perceived effort than the first concentric condition. The order of conditions 2-4 was randomised. After each condition, mental demand was monitored using the NASA-TLX scale. Changes in oxy- (O2Hb) and deoxy- (HHb) haemoglobin during cycling exercise were measured over the two prefrontal cortices and the right parietal lobe from a 15-probe layout using a continuous-wave NIRS system. Mental demand was significantly higher when performing eccentric compared to concentric cycling (p= .012) and when the intensity was fixed by the torque rather than the perceived effort (p□ .001). For both torque- or perceived effort-matched exercises, O2Hb was significantly greater (p< .001) in both prefrontal cortices and right parietal lobe, and HHb decreased in the left and right prefrontal cortices during eccentric compared to concentric cycling. The current study supports that acute eccentric cycling involves a higher mental demand and frontoparietal network activation compared to concentric cycling.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3