Author:
Cueva Christopher J.,Saez Alex,Marcos Encarni,Genovesio Aldo,Jazayeri Mehrdad,Romo Ranulfo,Salzman C. Daniel,Shadlen Michael N.,Fusi Stefano
Abstract
Our decisions often depend on multiple sensory experiences separated by time delays. The brain can remember these experiences and, simultaneously, estimate the timing between events. To understand the mechanisms underlying working memory and time encoding we analyze neural activity recorded during delays in four experiments on non-human primates. To disambiguate potential mechanisms, we propose two analyses, namely, decoding the passage of time from neural data, and computing the cumulative dimensionality of the neural trajectory over time. Time can be decoded with high precision in tasks where timing information is relevant and with lower precision when irrelevant for performing the task. Neural trajectories are always observed to be low dimensional. These constraints rule out working memory models that rely on constant, sustained activity, and neural networks with high dimensional trajectories, like reservoir networks. Instead, recurrent networks trained with backpropagation capture the time encoding properties and the dimensionality observed in the data.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference48 articles.
1. Baddeley, A. & Hitch, G. Working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation (1974).
2. Miyake, A. & Shah, P. Models of working memory. Cambridge University Press (1999).
3. Gibbon, J. , Malapani, C. , Dale, C. L. & Gallistel, C. R. Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges. Cognitive neuroscience (1997).
4. Buonomano, D. V. & Karmarkar, U. R. How do we tell time? Neuroscientist (2002).
5. Amit, D. J. Modeling brain function: The world of attractor neural networks (Cambridge university press, 1992).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献