Four ways to fit an ion channel model

Author:

Clerx M.ORCID,Beattie K.A.ORCID,Gavaghan D.J.ORCID,Mirams G.R.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTComputational models of the cardiac action potential are increasingly being used to investigate the effects of genetic mutations, predict pro-arrhythmic risk in drug development, and to guide clinical interventions. These safety-critical applications, and indeed our understanding of the cardiac action potential, depend on accurate characterisation of the underlying ionic currents. Four different methods can be found in the literature to fit ionic current models to single-cell measurements: (Method 1) fitting model equations directly to time constant, steady-state, and I-V summary curves; (Method 2) fitting by comparing simulated versions of these summary curves to their experimental counterparts; (Method 3) fitting to the current traces themselves from a range of protocols; and (Method 4) fitting to a single current trace from an information-rich voltage clamp protocol. We compare these methods using a set of experiments in which hERG1a current from single Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells was characterised using multiple fitting protocols and an independent validation protocol. We show that Methods 3 and 4 provide the best predictions on the independent validation set, and that the short information-rich protocols of Method 4 can replace much longer conventional protocols without loss of predictive ability. While data for Method 2 is most readily available from the literature, we find it performs poorly compared to Methods 3 and 4 both in accuracy of predictions and computational efficiency. Our results demonstrate how novel experimental and computational approaches can improve the quality of model predictions in safety-critical applications.Statement of SignificanceMathematical models have been constructed to capture and share our understanding of the kinetics of ion channel currents for almost 70 years, and hundreds of models have been developed, using a variety of techniques. We compare how well four of the main methods fit data, how reliable and efficient the process of fitting is, and how predictive the resulting models are for physiological situations. The most widely-used traditional approaches based on current-voltage and time constant-voltage curves do not produce the most predictive models. Short, optimised experimental voltage clamp protocols can be used to create models that are as predictive as ones derived from traditional protocols, opening up possibilities for measuring ion channel kinetics faster, more accurately and in single cells. As these models often form part of larger multi-scale action potential and tissue electrophysiology models, improved ion channel kinetics models could influence the findings of thousands of simulation studies.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3