What is the effectiveness of antiracist interventions for ethnic minority healthcare staff? A systematic review

Author:

Lalli KismetORCID,Adewole Oluwatomisin,Peters Holly,Price Chris,Lumb Blanche,Gal MicaelaORCID,Cooper Alison

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe National Health Service (NHS) has the most diverse workforce in the United Kingdom (UK), 25% (n= 309,532/1,200,000) of staff belong to ethnic minority groups. However, there is evidence of longstanding issues of racism within the NHS and discrimination towards ethnic minority healthcare staff has been rising since 2016. In the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, 95% of COVID-19 deaths among doctors were in an ethnic minority group. There has been no definitive answer for the disproportionate COVID-19 mortality but socioeconomic factors due to structural racism have been suggested as the main drivers. No studies have assessed the effectiveness of antiracist interventions for healthcare staff.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review; databases searched included: AMED, Medline via OVID, CINAHL, APA Pyscinfo, Web of Science and OVID Emcare 25th– 31stJanuary 2022. The interventions were structured using a model of antiracist interventions and analysed using narrative synthesis methods.Results16 papers were reviewed with interventions at different levels: personally mediated (n=9), multilevel (n=4) and institutional (n=3). Personally mediated interventions were workshops (n=8) and a mentorship scheme (n=1). Institutional interventions were policies (n=2) and increasing diversity initiative (n=1). Multilevel interventions were a mix of both. Study designs and risk of bias tools indicated that the quality of evidence was of low quality. Only two studies included control groups. Countries included the USA (n=11), Canada (n=1) and the UK (n=4).ConclusionThere is a lack of robust evidence for antiracist interventions for healthcare staff, especially at an institutional level. High quality research is required to evaluate the long-term effects of interventions.Funding statementThe Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre was funded for this work by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference60 articles.

1. GOV.UK. Ethnic diversity of public sector workforces. 2019 [accessed 5.4.22]. Available from: https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/summaries/public-sector-workforces#public-sector-staff-change-over-time

2. NHS. NHS workforce race and equality standard: 2019 data analysis report for NHS trusts. 2020 [accessed 5.4.22]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/wres-2019-data-report.pdf

3. Race Equality Foundation. The recruitment and retention of black and minority ethnic staff in the National Health Service. London 2007 [accessed 5.4.22]. Available from: http://raceequalityfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/health-brief4.pdf

4. Doyin A , Kline R , Ochieng M. Fair to Refer?: GMC; 2019. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/fair-to-refer-report_pdf-79011677.pdf

5. COVID-19 and BAME Group in the United Kingdom

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3