Adverse sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in seven low- and middle-income countries: MASC study

Author:

Hanlon CharlotteORCID,Lempp Heidi,Alem Atalay,Alemu Azeb Asaminew,Alvarado Rubén,Ayinde Olatunde,Adesola Adekunle,Brohan Elaine,Davies Thandi,Fekadu Wubalem,Gureje Oye,Jalagania Lucy,Makhashvili Nino,Mihretu Awoke,Misganaw Eleni,Milenova Maria,Mujirishvili TamarORCID,Myshakivska OlhaORCID,Pinchuk Irina,Solis-Araya Camila,Sorsdahl Katherine,Soto-Brandt Gonzalo,Susser Ezra,Toro-Devia Olga,Votruba NicoleORCID,Wickramasinghe Anuprabha,Williams Shehan,Thornicroft Graham

Abstract

AbstractA WHO rapid assessment of early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services worldwide found a consistent pattern of degradation. In this context the MASC study aimed to: identify the consequences of the pandemic for mental health services and people with pre- existing mental health conditions (MHCs) in 7 low- and middle-income countries; and (2) identify good practice to mitigate these impacts. The study was conducted in Chile, Ethiopia, Georgia, Nigeria, South Africa, Sri Lanka and Ukraine. This was an observational study, using a mixed- methods convergent design, triangulating data from: (1) 144 key informants participating in semi- structured interviews or focus groups and/or a self-completed survey; (2) routine service utilization data; (3) local grey literature; and (4) expert consultation. We found clear evidence in all sites that the pandemic exacerbated pre-existing disadvantages experienced by people with MHCs and led to a deterioration in the availability and quality of care, especially for psychosocial care. Alongside increased vulnerability to COVID-19, people with MHCs faced additional barriers to accessing prevention and treatment interventions compared to the general population. To varying extents, sites showed accelerated implementation of digital technologies, but with evidence of worsening inequities in access. Where primary care-based mental health care was more developed or prioritised, systems seemed more resilient and adaptive. Our findings have the following implications. First, mental health service reductions are clear examples of ‘structural stigma’, namely policy level decisions in healthcare which place a low priority upon services for people with MHCs. Second, integration of mental health care into all general health care settings is key to ensuring accessibility and parity of physical and mental health care. Third, digital innovations should be designed to strengthen and not fragment systems. We discuss these findings in terms of anticipating such challenges in future and preparing layers of resilience.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3