Reliability and criterion validity of a low-cost handgrip dynamometer: The Camry

Author:

Sánchez-Aranda LucíaORCID,Fernández-Ortega Javier,Martín-Fuentes Isabel,Toval Ángel,Jurak Gregor,Ruiz Jonatan R,Csányi Tamás,Ortega Francisco B.

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundHandgrip strength has been related with multiple health outcomes, including all-cause mortality and morbidity. Handgrip testing is a highly valid and reliable method, included in evidence-based fitness test batteries from preschool to older ages. Previously, Jamar and TKK dynamometers have shown good reliability and validity against known weights. However, the cost of these dynamometers is the major limitation for implementing handgrip strength testing in certain countries and settings, as well as at large scale. Recently, a ten times cheaper model (Camry Dynamometer) has been used in fitness surveillance systems, though its reliability and validity, compared to known weights and other well-validated dynamometers, remains unknown. Therefore, the aims of the current study were to test to examine test-retest reliability, inter-model reliability (comparing a Camry dynamometer with 3000 uses versus a new Camry dynamometer), and inter-instrument reliability (Camry versus TKK dynamometer) of Camry dynamometer, using calibrated known weights.MethodsA digital TKK 5401 dynamometer and two Camry EH101, a new and an “old” (3000 uses), dynamometers were used. Intra-instrument and inter-instrument reliability, and criterion related validity were assessed comparing the measures of the dynamometers with calibrated weights using the Bland and Altman’s method.ResultsIntra-instrument (retest minus test) reliability was very high (systematic error for test-retest reliability: New Camry = 0.01±0.49kg; Old Camry = -0.10±0.49kg; TKK = 0.14±0.77kg). The comparison between instruments showed small mean differences between Camry dynamometers and TKK (New Camry VS TKK: 0.84±0.79kg; Old Camry VS TKK: 0.88 ±0.85kg). The systematic error between New and Old Camry dynamometers was 0.03±0.57kg. Criterion-related validity showed smaller magnitude systematic errors in the Camry than TKK instruments (New Camry: -0.21±0.35kg; Old Camry: -0.18±0.79kg; TKK: -1.07±0.75kg).ConclusionsOur results support that Camry dynamometer has an excellent reliability and validity and is therefore a more affordable alternative for handgrip strength assessment. Our results also indicate a good durability of these devices, and that calibration is not necessary, even after several thousands of uses.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3