Abstract
AbstractThe amygdala responds to a large variety of socially and emotionally salient environmental and interoceptive stimuli. The context in which these stimuli occur determines their social and emotional significance. In canonical neurophysiological studies, the fast-paced succession of stimuli and events induce phasic changes in neural activity. During inter-trial intervals neural activity is expected to return to a stable and relatively featureless baseline. Context, such as the presence of a social partner, or the similarity of trials in a blocked design, induces brain states that can transcend the fast-paced succession of stimuli and can be recovered from the baseline firing rate of neurons. Indeed, the baseline firing rates of neurons in the amygdala change between blocks of trials of gentle grooming touch, delivered by a trusted social partner, and non-social airflow stimuli, delivered by a computer-controlled air valve. In this experimental paradigm, the presence of the groomer alone was sufficient to induce small but significant changes in baseline firing rates. Here, we examine local field potentials (LFP) recorded during these baseline periods to determine whether context was encoded by network dynamics that emerge in the local field potentials from the activity of large ensembles of neurons. We found that machine learning techniques can reliably decode social vs. non-social context from spectrograms of baseline local field potentials. Notably, decoding accuracy improved significantly with access to broad-band information. No significant differences were detected between the nuclei of the amygdala that receive direct or indirect inputs from areas of the prefrontal cortex known to coordinate flexible, context-dependent behaviors. The lack of nuclear specificity suggests that context-related synaptic inputs arise from a shared source, possibly interoceptive inputs that signal the sympathetic- vs. parasympathetic-dominated states characterizing non-social and social blocks, respectively.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory