Functional MRI connectivity accurately distinguishes cases with psychotic disorders from healthy controls, based on cortical features associated with neurodevelopment
Author:
Morgan Sarah EORCID, Young Jonathan, Patel Ameera X, Whitaker Kirstie J, Scarpazza Cristina, van Amelsvoort Therese, Marcelis Machteld, van Os Jim, Donohoe Gary, Mothersill David, Corvin Aiden, Arango Celso, Mechelli Andrea, van den Heuvel Martijn, Kahn René S, McGuire Philip, Brammer Michael, Bullmore Edward T
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundMachine learning (ML) can distinguish cases with psychotic disorder from healthy controls based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, with reported accuracy in the range 60-100%. It is not yet clear which MRI metrics are the most informative for case-control ML.MethodsWe analysed multi-modal MRI data from two independent case-control studies of patients with psychotic disorders (cases, N = 65, 28; controls, N = 59, 80) and compared ML accuracy across 5 MRI metrics. Cortical thickness, mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy were estimated at each of 308 cortical regions, as well as functional and structural connectivity between each pair of regions. Functional connectivity data were also used to classify non-psychotic siblings of cases (N=64) and to distinguish cases from controls in a third independent study (cases, N=67; controls, N = 81).ResultsIn both principal studies, the most diagnostic metric was fMRI connectivity: the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 92% and 77%, respectively. The cortical map of diagnostic connectivity features was replicable between studies (r = 0.31, P < 0.001); correlated with replicable case-control differences in fMRI degree centrality, and with prior cortical maps of aerobic glycolysis and adolescent development of functional connectivity; predicted intermediate probabilities of psychosis in siblings; and replicated in the third case-control study.ConclusionsML most accurately distinguished cases from controls by a replicable pattern of fMRI connectivity features, highlighting abnormal hubness of cortical nodes in an anatomical pattern consistent with the concept of psychosis as a disorder of network development.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference51 articles.
1. Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls 2. Sandra Vieira , Qi-yong Gong , Walter Pinaya , Cristina Scarpazza , Stefania Tognin , Benedicto Crespo-Facorro , Diana Tordesillas-Gutierrez , Victor Ortiz-García , Esther Setien-Suero , Floortje Scheepers , Neeltje Van Haren , Tiago Marques , Robin Murray , Anthony David , Paola Dazzan , Philip McGuire , and Andrea Mechelli . Using machine learning and structural neuroimaging to detect first episode psychosis: Reconsidering the evidence. Schizophrenia Bulletin, page sby189, 2019. 3. Du Lei, Walter Pinaya , Therese van Amelsvoort , Machteld Marcelis , Gary Donohoe , David Mothersill , Aiden Corvin , Michael Gill , Sandra Vieira , Xiaoqi Huang , Su Lui , Cristina Scarpazza , Jonathan Young , Celso Arango , Edward Bullmore , Gong Qiyong , Philip McGuire , and Andrea Mechelli . Detecting schizophrenia at the level of the individual: relative diagnostic value of whole-brain images, connectome-wide functional connectivity and graph-based metrics. Psychological Medicine, 2019. 4. Multi-center machine learning in imaging psychiatry: A meta-model approach;Neuroimage,2017 5. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Benchmarking functional connectome-based predictive models for resting-state fmri;Neuroimage,2019
|
|