Dual Guidance in Regional Anesthesia – Influence of Needle Electrode Configuration on Stimulation Success at Sciatic Nerve; A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial

Author:

Wegner Julia,Ertmer MartinORCID,Tafelski SaschaORCID,Klotz EddaORCID,Birnbaum JürgenORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionIn contrast to ultrasound technology (US), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for regional anesthesia was little improved in recent years. When using the combination of both techniques, PNS can give additional information for nerve localization to improve safety and success of regional anesthesia. There are influencing factors on the success rate of stimulation in PNS remaining uninvestigated in a clinical setting to date. This randomized controlled pilot trial evaluates the impact of shape and size of stimulation needles electrodes under dual guidance conditions.MethodsIn a randomized controlled clinical trial 35 participants undergoing lower limb surgery received a preoperative proximal sciatic nerve block in dual guidance technique. Use of facet needles with point shaped electrodes (N=19, facet group) were compared with tuohy needles with large electroconductive tips (N=16, touhy group). Stimulation success at minimal distance between needle tip and nerve was recorded. Block success and complications of regional anesthesia were assessed.ResultsIn 87% of successful stimulation (20 of 23) an ultrasound-proven contact of needle tip and sciatic nerve was necessary to elicit a motor response. More successful stimulations could performed using facet needles (84%, 16/19) compared to tuohy needles (44%, 7/16, p=0.03). If stimulation was successful the number of successful sensory blockades was increased (78%, 18/23, p=0.02). No serious complications of regional anesthesia were recorded.DiscussionThis pilot trial suggests that stimulation needles with small electrodes may be more reliable in indicating a contact of needle and nerve, which may improve safety and success of proximal sciatic nerve blocks.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference23 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3