Axisymmetric diffusion kurtosis imaging with Rician bias correction: A simulation study

Author:

Oeschger Jan MalteORCID,Tabelow KarstenORCID,Mohammadi SiawooshORCID

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the estimation accuracy of axisymmetric diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and standard DKI in combination with Rician bias correction (RBC) under the influence of noise. Methods: Axisymmetric DKI is more robust against noise-induced variation in the measured signal than standard DKI because of its reduced parameter space. However, its susceptibility to Rician noise bias at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) is unknown. Here, we investigate two main questions: first, does Rician bias correction improve estimation accuracy of axisymmetric DKI?; second, is the estimation accuracy of axisymmetric DKI increased compared to standard DKI? Estimation accuracy was investigated on the five axisymmetric DKI tensor metrics (AxTM): the parallel and perpendicular diffusivity and kurtosis and the mean kurtosis, using a simulation study based on synthetic and in-vivo data. Results: We found that RBC was most effective for increasing accuracy of the parallel AxTM in highly to moderately aligned white matter. For the perpendicular AxTM, axisymmetric DKI without RBC performed slightly better than with RBC. However, the combination of axisymmetric DKI with RBC was the overall best performing algorithm across all five AxTM and the axisymmetric DKI framework itself substantially improved accuracy in tissues with low fiber alignment. Conclusion: The combination of axisymmetric DKI with RBC facilitates accurate DKI parameter estimation at unprecedented low SNRs (approx 15), possibly making it a valuable tool for neuroscience and clinical research studies where scan time is a limited resource. The tools used in this paper are publicly available in the open-source ACID toolbox for SPM.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3