Reproducibility problem with a proposed standard method to measure disinfection efficacy

Author:

Hilgren JohnORCID,Srikanth Mrudula,Brutofsky Milady,Mainquist Keith,Prew Paul,King William,Jones Rhonda,Hellickson Lisa,Luedtke Josh,Restrepo Kristie,Brill FlorianORCID,Quinn Patrick

Abstract

AbstractA collaborative study was carried out in four laboratories to determine the reproducibility of a proposed ASTM International standard method for quantitatively evaluating the efficacy of disinfectants on hard, non-porous surfaces against bacteria. The method, known as the Quantitative Method, has also been suggested as a future regulatory standard for the United States and internationally. The multi-lab study was carried out using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and an alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride antimicrobial product diluted in hard water. Results of the study showed acceptable repeatability in log10 reductions within each laboratory, but unacceptable reproducibility across laboratories despite careful analyst training and standardization of test conditions. A follow-up study ruled out analyst-to-analyst differences as the cause of the poor reproducibility. As it currently exists, the Quantitative Method is not sufficiently reproducible. Ruggedness testing to assess the sensitivity of the method to small changes in operational factors is recommended.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference26 articles.

1. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility

2. United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requestors. Disinfectants: EPA Lacks Assurance They Work. 1990; GAO/RCED-90-139. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/assets/rced-90-139.pdf

3. Hard surface carrier test as a quantitative test of disinfection: a collaborative study;J AOAC Int,1995

4. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Product Performance Test Guidelines OCSPP 810.2200: Disinfectants for Use on Hard Surfaces, Guidance for Efficacy Testing. 2018; EPA 712-C-17-004. Available from: https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0150-0036

5. Workshop Summary Report. 2002. OECD. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/pesticides-biocides/2494153.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3