People underestimate the change of airborne Corona virus exposure when changing distance to an infected person: On interpersonal distance, exposure time, face masks and perceived virus exposure

Abstract

AbstractParticipants judged airborne Corona virus exposure following a change of inter-personal distance and time of a conversation with an infected person with and without a face mask. About 75% of the participants underestimated how much virus exposure changes when the distance to an infected person changed. The smallest average face to face distance from an infected person without a mask that a participant judged as sufficiently safe was about 12 feet (3.67 m). Correlations showed that the more a person underestimated the effects of change of distance on exposure the shorter was that person’s own safety distance. On average the effects of different lengths of a conversation on exposure were correct, but those who judged the effects of time as smaller tended to select longer safety distances. Worry of own COVID-19 infection correlated with protective behaviors: keeping longer safety distances, avoiding public gatherings, postponement of meetings with friends. The results showed that the protective effects of both distancing and wearing a face mask were under-estimated by a majority of the participants. Implications of these results were discussed last.