Comparison of Glycemic Control between Intensive Insulin Regimen and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin infusion: A Meta-Analysis Report of Type-1 Diabetics from Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Aziz Kamran Mahmood AhmedORCID,Othman Abdullah

Abstract

AbstractAchieving glycemic control and targets are challenging in type-1 diabetes management. To achieve this, intensive insulin therapy or multiple daily injections (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or pump therapy have been used in various health care settings. However, there has been a debate on their superiority. Some of researchers have recommended MDI, while others SCII. We compared MDI with CSII by a literature search. We have conducted mata-analysis for MDI and CSII on ten randomized controlled trials on 809 type-1 diabetics 809, MDI (N = 394) or CSII (N = 415). Heterogeneity between trials was quantified by conventional Q-statistic (Cochran’s heterogeneity statistic) and Higgins I2 statistic with 0-40% representing negligible heterogeneity, 30-60% moderate heterogeneity, 50-90% substantial heterogeneity and 75-100% considerable heterogeneity. tau-squared (τ2) was used to observe between-study random-effects variance. Meta Analyst software was used to analyze the data and to conduct meta-analysis. SPSS was used to analyze HbA1c student’s t-test for MDI and CSII. A random-effect analysis ((DerSimonian-Laird method) performed on ten studies found that the percentage of HbA1c was lower in patients receiving CSII compared with those receiving MDI; standardized mean difference (SMD) was 0.441, 95% confidence interval 0.267 to 0.616, p < 0.001; equivalent to a difference of 0.39%, favoring CSII. I2 statistic was 20.9; τ2 = 0.016; Q = 11.378 with df = 9, indicating that heterogeneity was not significant (heterogeneity p-value = 0.251). Patients on CSII demonstrated significantly lower values (8.2±0.72 versus 7.73±0.72; p-value < 0.001 respectively). This statistical and meta-analysis favors the usage of insulin pump therapy. We concluded that patient centered approach should be used while selecting the patients for insulin pump (CSII) or MDI.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference24 articles.

1. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: an approach to achieving normoglycae-mia;BMJ,1978

2. Intensive conventional and insulin pump therapy in adult type 1 diabetes. A crossover study;Ann Intern Med,1982

3. Jeitler K , Horvath K , Berghold A , Gratzer TW , Neeser K , Pieber TR , Siebenhofer A . Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

4. Improvement in Diabetes Care of Underinsured Patients Enrolled in Project Dulce

5. NICE. Guidance on the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes. Technology appraisal guidance no. 57. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2003.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3