A cautionary note on the use of haplotype callers in Phylogenomics

Abstract

AbstractNext-generation-sequencing haplotype callers are commonly used in studies to call variants from newly-sequenced species. However, due to the current availability of genomic resources, it is still common practice to use only one reference genome for a given genus, or even one reference for an entire clade of a higher taxon. The problem with traditional haplotype callers such as the one from GATK, is that they are optimized for variant calling at the population level, but not at the phylogenetic level. Thus, the consequences for downstream analyses can be substantial. Here, through simulations, we compare the performance between the haplotype callers of GATK and ATLAS, and present their differences at various phylogenetic scales. We show how the haplotype caller of GATK substantially underestimates the number of variants at the phylogenetic level, but not at the population level. We also quantified the level at which the accuracy of heterozygote calls declines with increasing distance to the reference genome. Such decrease is very sharp in GATK, while ATLAS maintains a high accuracy in variant calling, even at moderately-divergent species from the reference. We further suggest that efforts should be taken towards acquiring more reference genomes per species, before pursuing high-scale phylogenomic studies.