Abstract
AbstractEarly non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) significantly reduced the death toll of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, there are vast differences in how quickly governments implemented NPIs. In this paper, we analyze the role of public attention, measured as the share of daily Google searches in a country related to COVID-19, in the timing of the NPI responses. We first show that public attention depends strongly on whether there are cases in own country. We then show that countries with high levels of public attention are more likely to implement non-pharmaceutical interventions, even after controlling for the number of cases and deaths. Finally, we show that the extent to which a government responds to public attention is highly dependent on the country’s institutional quality. The positive effect of public attention on policy implementation is driven entirely by countries with good institutions.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference34 articles.
1. Adolph, C. , Amano, K. , Bang-Jensen, B. , Fullman, N. & Wilkerson, J. (2020). Pandemic politics: timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19. Manuscript, available at https://faculty.washington.edu/cadolph/papers/AABFW2020.pdf
2. Educational investment responses to economic opportunity: evidence from Indian road construction;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2020
3. Ajzenman, N. , Cavalcanti, T. & Da Mata, D. (2020). More than words: Leaders’ speech and risky behavior during a pandemic. JCEPR DP 14707.
4. Do laws shape attitudes? Evidence from same-sex relationship recognition policies in Europe;European Economic Review,2020
5. Allcott, H. , Boxell, L. , Conway, J. C. , Gentzkow, M. , Thaler, M. & David Y. Yang, D.Y. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. NBER Working Paper No. 26946.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献