Author:
Stroberg Wylie,Schnell Santiago
Abstract
AbstractThe conditions under which the Michaelis–Menten equation accurately captures the steady-state kinetics of a simple enzyme-catalyzed reaction is contrasted with the conditions under which the same equation can be used to estimate parameters, KM and V, from progress curve data. Validity of the underlying assumptions leading to the Michaelis–Menten equation are shown to be necessary, but not sufficient to guarantee accurate estimation of KM and V. Detailed error analysis and numerical “experiments” show the required experimental conditions for the independent estimation of both KM and V from progress curves. A timescale, tQ, measuring the portion of the time course over which the progress curve exhibits substantial curvature provides a novel criterion for accurate estimation of KM and V from a progress curve experiment. It is found that, if the initial substrate concentration is of the same order of magnitude as KM, the estimated values of the KM and V will correspond to their true values calculated from the microscopic rate constants of the corresponding mass-action system, only so long as the initial enzyme concentration is less than KM.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference44 articles.
1. The origins of enzyme kinetics
2. One hundred years of Michaelis-Menten kinetics;Persp. Sci.,2015
3. A Note on the Kinetics of Enzyme Action
4. Current IUBMB recommendations on enzyme nomenclature and kinetics;Persp. Sci.,2014
5. D. L. Purich , Enzyme kinetics: Catalysis & Control: A reference of theory and best-practice methods, Academic Press, London, 2010.