Comparing men who have sex with men and inject drugs and people who inject drugs who are men and have sex with men in San Francisco: Implications for HIV and hepatitis C virus prevention

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundMen who have sex with men (MSM) and people who inject drugs (PWID) carry a disproportionate burden of HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. We compared the demographic and risk profiles of MSM who inject drugs (MSM-IDU, i.e., men reached through affiliation with MSM) and PWID who are men and have sex with men (PWID-MSM, i.e., men reached through affiliation with PWID).MethodsWe used data from the most recent waves of the National HIV Behavioural Surveillance among MSM (2017) and PWID (2018) in San Francisco. Participants were recruited through venue-based (MSM) and peer-referral (PWID) sampling and completed standardised questionnaires. We compared the characteristics of MSM-IDU and PWID-MSM using bivariate tests.ResultsOf 504 participants completing the MSM survey, 6.2% reported past-year injection drug use (MSM-IDU). Among 311 male participants completing the PWID survey, 19.0% reported past-year sex with a male (PWID-MSM). Relative to MSM-IDU, more PWID-MSM were older, identified as bisexual, had lower income, a history of incarceration and were homeless. MSM-IDU had more male sexual partners (median: 10 vs 3) and fewer injected daily (29.0% vs 64.4%) than PWID-MSM. While more PWID-MSM sought sterile equipment from a syringe program (86.4% vs 35.5%), fewer reported using PrEP (15.0% vs 42.9%).ConclusionThe sociodemographic, risk behaviour, and prevention access profiles of MSM-IDU and PWID-MSM in San Francisco suggest that they represent distinct populations who may require tailored HIV and HCV prevention strategies. MSM- and PWID-focused prevention programs should provide combined sexual health and harm reduction messages and services.