Author:
Bekliz Meriem,Perez-Rodriguez Francisco,Puhach Olha,Adea Kenneth,Melancia Stéfane Marques,Baggio Stephanie,Corvaglia Anna-Rita,Jacquerioz-Bausch Frédérique,Alvarez Catia,Essaidi-Laziosi Manel,Escadafal Camille,Kaiser Laurent,Eckerle Isabella
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe emergence of each novel SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) requires investigation of its potential impact on the performance of diagnostic tests in use, including Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT). Although anecdotal reports have been circulating that the newly emerged Omicron variant is in principle detectable by Ag-RDTs, few data on sensitivity are available.MethodsWe have performed 1) analytical sensitivity testing with cultured virus in eight Ag-RDTs and 2) retrospective testing in duplicates with clinical samples from vaccinated individuals with Omicron (n=18) or Delta (n=17) breakthrough infection on seven Ag-RDTs.FindingsOverall, we have found large heterogenicity between Ag-RDTs for detecting Omicron. When using cultured virus, we observed a trend towards lower sensitivity for Omicron detection compared to earlier circulating SARS-CoV-2 and the other VOCs. When comparing performance for Delta and Omicron in a comparable set of clinical samples in seven Ag-RDTs, 124/252 (49.2%) of all test performed showed a positive result for Omicron compared to 156/238 (65.6%) for Delta samples. Sensitivity for both Omicron and Delta between Ag-RDTs was highly variable. Four out of seven Ag-RDTs showed significantly lower sensitivity (p<0.001) to detect Omicron when compared to Delta while three had comparable sensitivity to Delta.InterpretationSensitivity for detecting Omicron is highly variable between Ag-RDTs, necessitating a careful consideration when using these tests to guide infection prevention measures. While analytical and retrospective testing may be a proxy and timely solution to generate performance data, it is not a replacement for clinical evaluations which are urgently needed. Biological and technical reasons for detection failure by some Ag-RDTs need to be further investigated.FundingThis work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant numbers 196383, 196644 and 198412), the Fondation Ancrage Bienfaisance du Groupe Pictet, the Fondation Privée des Hôpiteaux Universitaires de Genève and FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference27 articles.
1. SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: High sensitivity to detect infectious virus
2. World Health Organization (WHO) Antigen-Detection in the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Rapid Immunoassays. [(accessed on 28 April 2021)];Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/antigen-detection-in-the-diagnosis-of-sars-cov-2infection-using-rapid-immunoassays.
3. Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity — A Strategy for Containment
4. Wordl Heath Organization (WHO) Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---10-august-2021 Date: August, 10 2021 Date.
5. World Health Organization (WHO). https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/ (accessed 08.12.2021.