Author:
Cornelissen Anne,Florescu Roberta Andreea,Reese Stefanie,Behr Marek,Ranno Anna,Manjunatha Kiran,Schaaps Nicole,Böhm Christian,Liehn Elisa Anamaria,Zhao Liguo,Nilcham Pakhwan,Milzi Andrea,Schröder Jörg,Vogt Felix Jan
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundDespite optimizations of coronary stenting technology, a residual risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains. Vessel wall injury has important impact on the development of ISR. While injury can be assessed in histology, there is no injury score available to be used in clinical practice.MethodsSeven rats underwent abdominal aorta stent implantation. At 4 weeks after implantation, animals were euthanized, and strut indentation, defined as the impression of the strut into the vessel wall, as well as neointimal growth were assessed. Established histological injury scores were assessed to confirm associations between indentation and vessel wall injury. In addition, stent strut indentation was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in an exemplary clinical case.ResultsStent strut indentation was associated with vessel wall injury in histology. Furthermore, indentation was positively correlated with neointimal thickness, both in the per-strut analysis (r=0.5579) and in the per-section analysis (r=0.8620; both p ≤0.001). In a clinical case, indentation quantification in OCT was feasible, enabling assessment of injuryin vivo.ConclusionAssessing stent strut indentation enables periprocedural assessment of stent-induced damagein vivoand therefore allows for optimization of stent implantation. The assessment of stent strut indentation might become a valuable tool in clinical practice.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory