Optimizing Short-format Training: an International Consensus on Effective, Inclusive, and Career-spanning Professional Development in the Life Sciences and Beyond

Author:

Williams Jason J.ORCID,Tractenberg Rochelle E.ORCID,Batut BéréniceORCID,Becker Erin A.ORCID,Brown Anne M.ORCID,Burke Melissa L.ORCID,Busby BenORCID,Cooch Nisha K.,Dillman Allissa A.ORCID,Donovan Samuel S.ORCID,Doyle Maria A.ORCID,van Gelder Celia W.G.ORCID,Hall Christina R.ORCID,Hertweck Kate L.ORCID,Jordan Kari L.ORCID,Jungck John R.ORCID,Latour Ainsley R.,Lindvall Jessica M.ORCID,Lloret-Llinares MartaORCID,McDowell Gary S.ORCID,Morris Rana,Mourad TeresaORCID,Nisselle AmyORCID,Ordóñez PatriciaORCID,Paladin LisannaORCID,Palagi Patricia M.ORCID,Sukhai Mahadeo A.ORCID,Teal Tracy K.ORCID,Woodley LouiseORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTScience, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) fields change rapidly and are increasingly interdisciplinary. Commonly, STEMM practitioners use short-format training (SFT) such as workshops and short courses for upskilling and reskilling, but unaddressed challenges limit SFT’s effectiveness and inclusiveness. Prior work, including the NSF 2026 Reinventing Scientific Talent proposal, called for addressing SFT challenges, and a diverse international group of experts in education, accessibility, and life sciences came together to do so. This paper describes the phenomenography and content analyses that produced a set of 14 actionable recommendations to systematically strengthen SFT. Recommendations were derived from findings in the educational sciences and the experiences of several of the largest life science SFT programs. Recommendations cover the breadth of SFT contexts and stakeholder groups and include actions for instructors (e.g., make equity and inclusion an ethical obligation), programs (e.g., centralize infrastructure for assessment and evaluation), as well as organizations and funders (e.g., professionalize training SFT instructors; deploy SFT to counter inequity). Recommendations are aligned into a purpose-built framework— “The Bicycle Principles”—that prioritizes evidenced-based teaching, inclusiveness, and equity, as well as the ability to scale, share, and sustain SFT. We also describe how the Bicycle Principles and recommendations are consistent with educational change theories and can overcome systemic barriers to delivering consistently effective, inclusive, and career-spanning SFT.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSTEMM practitioners need sustained and customized professional development to keep up with innovations. Short-format training (SFT) such as workshops and short-courses are relied upon widely but have unaddressed limitations. This project generated principles and recommendations to make SFT consistently effective, inclusive, and career-spanning. Optimizing SFT could broaden participation in STEMM by preparing practitioners more equitably with transformative skills. Better SFT would also serve members of the STEMM workforce who have several decades of productivity ahead, but who may not benefit from education reforms that predominantly focus on undergraduate STEMM. The Bicycle Principles and accompanying recommendations apply to any SFT instruction and may be especially useful in rapidly evolving and multidisciplinary fields such as artificial intelligence, genomics, and precision medicine.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference60 articles.

1. D. J. Deming , K. L. Noray , STEM Careers and the Changing Skill Requirements of Work (2018) https://doi.org/10.3386/w25065.

2. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), at the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), PubMed. PubMed (Search term, “Machine Learning”).

3. R. V. Yampolskiy , Unexplainability and Incomprehensibility of Artificial Intelligence. arXiv [cs.CY] (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.03869.

4. R. Chaudhury , P. J. Guo , P. K. Chilana , “There’s no way to keep up!”: Diverse Motivations and Challenges Faced by Informal Learners of ML in 2022 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), (2022), pp. 1–11.

5. On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3