A systematic review of the effectiveness and implementation readiness of psychosocial interventions for psychosis in South Asia

Author:

Lyles Sophie,Khan Zahra,Qureshi OnaizaORCID,Shaikh MadihaORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLittle is known about the effectiveness and implementation of psychosocial interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In South Asia, specialist psychiatric resources are scarce. Support for psychosis often falls on the family or caregiver which can increase feelings of burden, impact caregivers’ wellbeing, and increase mental health stigma. Psychosocial interventions are increasingly used for psychosis in South Asia and could reduce relapse and symptoms, reduce caregiver burden, conserve cost and resources. The aim of this review was to appraise the effectiveness and implementation readiness of psychosocial interventions for people with psychosis in LMICs within South Asia.MethodA systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Global Health, and Web of Science. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022329254). Studies were rated on two scales assessing quality and implementation readiness.ResultsTwenty-six papers were included, nine intervention-types including community-based interventions/assertive outreach; CaCBTp; FAP; psychoeducation; cognitive retraining/rehabilitation; social cognition/skills; family/ caregiver intervention; telehealth intervention; yoga-based intervention in six South Asian countries.Findings suggest a multicomponent community-based intervention (MCBI) was the most implementation ready due to its standardisation, good clinical outcome outcomes for patients and caregivers, and training and cost evaluations.ConclusionOf the included studies, MCBI and community-based outreach interventions utilising lay health workers appear to be the most implementation ready and are suggested to best address the treatment gap in South Asia.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference53 articles.

1. Global Epidemiology and Burden of Schizophrenia: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

2. In: Organization WH, editor. mhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-Specialized Health Settings: Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): Version 20. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva 2016.

3. Organisation WH. Management of Physical Health Conditions in Adults with Severe Mental Disorders. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva 2018.

4. Universal Health Coverage for Schizophrenia: A Global Mental Health Priority

5. Overview of schizophrenia research and treatment in Pakistan;Heliyon,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3