Tumor-specific activity of precision medicines in the NCI-MATCH trial

Author:

Zhou IvvoneORCID,Plana DeborahORCID,Palmer Adam C.ORCID

Abstract

Structured AbstractBackgroundNCI-MATCH is a precision medicine basket trial designed to test the effectiveness of treating cancers based on specific genetic changes in patients’ tumors, regardless of cancer type. Multiple subprotocols have each tested different targeted therapies matched to specific genetic aberrations. Most subprotocols exhibited low rates of tumor shrinkage as evaluated across all tumor types enrolled. We hypothesized that these results may arise because these precision cancer therapies have tumor type-specific efficacy, as is common among other cancer therapies.MethodsTo test the hypothesis that certain tumor types are more sensitive to specific therapies than other tumor types, we applied permutation testing to tumor volume change and progression-free survival data from ten published NCI-MATCH subprotocols (together n=435 patients). False discovery rate was controlled by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.ResultsSix of ten subprotocols exhibited statistically significant evidence of tumor-specific drug sensitivity, four of which were previously considered negative based on response rate across all tumors. This signal-finding analysis highlights potential uses of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in urothelial carcinomas with actionableFGFRaberrations, MEK inhibition in lung cancers withBRAFnon-V600Emutations, and MEK inhibition in cholangiocarcinomas withNRASmutations.ConclusionsThese findings support the value of basket trials because even when precision medicines do not have tumor-agnostic activity, basket trials can identify tumor-specific activity for future study.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference35 articles.

1. The Hallmarks of Cancer

2. Efficacy and Safety of a Specific Inhibitor of the BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

3. Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations

4. Master Protocols to Study Multiple Therapies, Multiple Diseases, or Both;N Engl J Med,2017

5. Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples;Ann Oncol,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3