Abstract
AbstractFoodborne diseases represent a link between environmental, animal, and human health interfaces from the One Health perspective. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming the gold standard in foodborne surveillance, worldwide. WGS than provides precision data from pathogens allows laboratories to resolve the genetic relations among all sources from One Health perspective, especially during outbreak investigations, getting insights into their transmission routes and pathogenicity.Salmonellaspp. is the most prevalent foodborne bacteria in Colombia, in 2020, 268 foodborne outbreaks were reported to National health institute (INS) and 3079 invasive and faecal salmonellosis samples from 81% of the Colombian geographical regions. Several studies in different food sources exhibited an increase of contamination withSalmonella, a public health concern due to the steady development of antimicrobial resistance associated to specific serovars. However, integration ofSalmonella spp. data including food-chain supply and clinical interfaces is very scarce in Colombia. This study carried out a national comparison ofSalmonellaisolates collected from food-chain supply and clinical sources. Using an epidemiological and phenotypic approach, we demonstrated the higher resolution of WGS compared with PFGE, routinely used inSalmonellasurveillance in Colombia. For example, the resolution of PFGE allowed the description of two main clusters of foodSalmonellaEnteritidis isolates which were expanded to eight clades by using WGS. Virulence factors and antimicrobial determinant genes observed in the foodborne clades should be considered a public health concern in Colombia. WGS is a technology that provides precise and valid evidence for the establishment of dissemination routes of foodborne high-riskSalmonellaclades, but it requires an integrative and continued collaboration between the stakeholders across the One Health interfaces to promote and support integrated real-time actions in public health.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference73 articles.
1. WHO WHO. Diarrhoeal disease [Internet]. Diarrhoeal disease. 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 31]. p. 1. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diarrhoeal-disease
2. Kirk MD , Pires SM , Black RE , Caipo M , Crump JA , Devleesschauwer B , et al. World Health Organization Estimates of the Global and Regional Disease Burden of 22 Foodborne Bacterial, Protozoal, and Viral Diseases, 2010: A Data Synthesis. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 Apr 3];12(12). Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4668831/
3. Salmonella and Campylobacter in Chicken Meat - Meeting Report. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series (MRA) 19 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 31]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/1ba49045-e062-501c-a32f-6f6cb15cf631/
4. CDC. 2015 Surveillance Report - FoodNet. FoodNet. 2015;1–26.
5. ECDC ECFDP and C. Salmonellosis - Annual Epidemiological Report for 2017. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2019;(January):8.