Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments: A systematic review

Author:

Ortiz-Escobar Luisa MaríaORCID,Chavarria Mario Andres,Schönenberger KlausORCID,Hurst-Majno Samia,Stein Michael Ashley,Mugeere Anthony,Rivas-Velarde Minerva

Abstract

AbstractDespite scientific and technological advances in the field of assistive technology (AT) for people with visual impairment (VI), technological designs are frequently based on a poor understanding of the physical and social context of use, resulting in devices that are less than optimal for their intended beneficiaries. To resolve this situation, user-centred approaches in the development process of AT have been widely adopted in recent years. However, there is a lack of systematization on the application of this approach. This systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022307466), assesses the application of the ISO 9241-210 human-centred design principles in allegedly “user-centred designed” AT developments for persons with VI (see S1 PROSPERO Protocol). The results point to a wide variation of the depth of understanding of user needs, a poor characterization of the application of the User Centred Design (UCD) approach in the initial design phases or in the early prototyping, and a vague description of user feedback and device iteration. Among the principles set out in ISO 9241-210, the application of 5.6: “the design team includes multidisciplinary skills and perspectives” is the one for which the least evidence is found. The results show there is not enough evidence to fully assess the impact of UCD in 1. promoting innovation regarding AT products and practices, and 2. Judging if AT produced following such standards is leading to better user access, wellbeing outcomes and satisfaction. To address this gap it is necessary to, first, generate better implementation of UCD in AT development and second, to strengthen evidence regarding the implementation and outcomes of using UCD for AT. To better engage with the realities of persons with VI, we propose capacity building across development teams regarding UCD, its principles and components; better planning for UCD implementation; and cross-fertilization across engineering disciplines and social and clinical science.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference57 articles.

1. Paving the path: drivers of standardization participation at ISO;JTT,2022

2. Thomas V , Remy C , Bates O . The limits of HCD: Reimagining the anthropocentricity of ISO 9241-210. LIMITS ‘17 Workshop on Computing Within Limits. 2017;: p. 85-92.

3. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-210:2019. Part 210: Human-centred Design for Interactive Systems. In Standarization IOf. ISO 9241: Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction.; 2019.

4. A closer look on the user centred design;Procedia Manuf,2015

5. Magnier C , Thomann G , Villeneuve F , Zwolinsk P . Investigation of methods for the design of assistive device: UCD and medical tools. In IDMME_P30; 2010; Bordeaux, France. p. 5397-5404.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3