Abstract
AbstractDespite scientific and technological advances in the field of assistive technology (AT) for people with visual impairment (VI), technological designs are frequently based on a poor understanding of the physical and social context of use, resulting in devices that are less than optimal for their intended beneficiaries. To resolve this situation, user-centred approaches in the development process of AT have been widely adopted in recent years. However, there is a lack of systematization on the application of this approach. This systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022307466), assesses the application of the ISO 9241-210 human-centred design principles in allegedly “user-centred designed” AT developments for persons with VI (see S1 PROSPERO Protocol). The results point to a wide variation of the depth of understanding of user needs, a poor characterization of the application of the User Centred Design (UCD) approach in the initial design phases or in the early prototyping, and a vague description of user feedback and device iteration. Among the principles set out in ISO 9241-210, the application of 5.6: “the design team includes multidisciplinary skills and perspectives” is the one for which the least evidence is found. The results show there is not enough evidence to fully assess the impact of UCD in 1. promoting innovation regarding AT products and practices, and 2. Judging if AT produced following such standards is leading to better user access, wellbeing outcomes and satisfaction. To address this gap it is necessary to, first, generate better implementation of UCD in AT development and second, to strengthen evidence regarding the implementation and outcomes of using UCD for AT. To better engage with the realities of persons with VI, we propose capacity building across development teams regarding UCD, its principles and components; better planning for UCD implementation; and cross-fertilization across engineering disciplines and social and clinical science.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference57 articles.
1. Paving the path: drivers of standardization participation at ISO;JTT,2022
2. Thomas V , Remy C , Bates O . The limits of HCD: Reimagining the anthropocentricity of ISO 9241-210. LIMITS ‘17 Workshop on Computing Within Limits. 2017;: p. 85-92.
3. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-210:2019. Part 210: Human-centred Design for Interactive Systems. In Standarization IOf. ISO 9241: Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction.; 2019.
4. A closer look on the user centred design;Procedia Manuf,2015
5. Magnier C , Thomann G , Villeneuve F , Zwolinsk P . Investigation of methods for the design of assistive device: UCD and medical tools. In IDMME_P30; 2010; Bordeaux, France. p. 5397-5404.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献