Haldane’s Probability of Mutant Survival is Not the Probability of Allele Establishment

Author:

Krukov Ivan,de Koning A.P. JasonORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTHaldane notably showed in 1927 that the probability of fixation for an advantageous allele is approximately 2s, for selective advantages. This widely known result is variously interpreted as either the fixation probability or the establishment probability, where the latter is considered the likelihood that an allele will survive long enough to have effectively escaped loss by drift. While Haldane was concerned with escape from loss by drift in the same paper, in this short note we point out that: 1) Haldane’s ‘probability of survival’ is analogous to the probability of fixation in a Wright-Fisher model (as also shown by others); and 2) This result is unrelated to Haldane’s consideration of how common an allele must be to ‘probably spread through the species’. We speculate that Haldane’s survival probability may have become misunderstood over time due to a conflation of terminology about surviving drift and ‘ultimately surviving’ (i.e., fixing). Indeed, we find that the probability of establishment remarkably appears to have been overlooked all these years, perhaps as a consequence of this misunderstanding. Using straightforward diffusion and Markov chain methods, we show that under Haldane’s assumptions, where establishment is defined by eventual fixation being more likely that extinction, the establishment probability is actually 4swhen the fixation probability is 2s. Generalizing consideration to deleterious, neutral, and adaptive alleles in finite populations, if establishment is defined by the odds ratio between eventual fixation and extinction,k, the general establishment probability is (1 +k)/ktimes the fixation probability. It is therefore 4swhenk= 1, or 3swhenk= 2 for beneficial alleles in large populations. Askis made large, establishment becomes indistinguishable from fixation, and ceases to be a useful concept. As a result, we recommend establishment be generally defined as when the odds of ultimate fixation are greater than for extinction (k= 1, following Haldane), or when fixation is twice as likely as extinction (k= 2).

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3