Common Analysis of Direct RNA SequencinG CUrrently Leads to Misidentification of 5-Methylcytosine Modifications at GCU Motifs

Abstract

ABSTRACTRNA modifications, such as methylation, can be detected with Oxford Nanopore Technologies direct RNA sequencing. One commonly used tool for detecting 5-methylcytosine (m5C) modifications is Tombo, which uses an “Alternative Model” to detect putative modifications from a single sample. We examined direct RNA sequencing data from diverse taxa including virus, bacteria, fungi, and animals. The algorithm consistently identified a 5-methylcytosine at the central position of a GCU motif. However, it also identified a 5-methylcytosine in the same motif in fully unmodifiedin vitrotranscribed RNA, suggesting that this a frequent false prediction. In the absence of further validation, several published predictions of 5-methylcytosine in human coronavirus and human cerebral organoid RNA in a GCU context should be reconsidered.IMPORTANCEThe detection of chemical modifications to RNA is a rapidly expanding field within epigenetics. Nanopore sequencing technology provides an attractive means of detecting these modifications directly on the RNA, but accurate modification predictions are dependent upon the software developed to interpret the sequencing results. One of these tools, Tombo, allows users to detect modifications using sequencing results from a single RNA sample. However, we find that this method falsely predicts modifications in a specific sequence context across a variety of RNA samples, including RNA that lacks modifications. Results from previous publications include predictions in human coronaviruses with this sequence context and should be reconsidered. Our results highlight the importance of using RNA modification detection tools with caution in the absence of a control RNA sample for comparison.