Generalizing Stepping Concepts To Non-Straight Walking

Abstract

AbstractPeople rarely walk in straight lines. Instead, we make frequent turns or other maneuvers. Spatiotemporal parameters fundamentally characterize gait. For straight walking, these parameters are well-defined for that task of walking on a straightpath. Generalizing these concepts tonon-straight walking, however, is not straightforward. People also follow non-straight paths imposed by their environment (store aisle, sidewalk, etc.) or choose readily-predictable, stereotypical paths of their own. People actively maintain lateral position to stay on their path and readily adapt their stepping when their path changes. We therefore propose a conceptually coherent convention that defines step lengths and widths relative to known walking paths. Our convention simply re-aligns lab-based coordinates to be tangent to a walker’s path at the mid-point between the two footsteps that define each step. We hypothesized this would yield results both morecorrectand more consistent with notions from straight walking. We defined several common non-straight walking tasks: single turns, lateral lane changes, walking on circular paths, and walking on arbitrary curvilinear paths. For each, we simulated idealized step sequences denoting “perfect” performance with known constant step lengths and widths. We compared results to path-independent alternatives. For each, we directly quantified accuracy relative to knowntruevalues. Results strongly confirmed our hypothesis. Our convention returned vastly smaller errors and introducednoartificial stepping asymmetries across all tasks. All results for our convention rationally generalized concepts from straight walking. Taking walking paths explicitly into account as important task goals themselves thus resolves conceptual ambiguities of prior approaches.