Dismantling cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic insomnia in adults with or without comorbidities: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis

Author:

Furukawa YukiORCID,Sakata MasatsuguORCID,Yamamoto RyuichiroORCID,Nakajima Shun,Kikuchi Shino,Inoue Mari,Ito MasamiORCID,Noma Hiroku,Takashina Hikari NishimuraORCID,Funada SatoshiORCID,Ostinelli Edoardo G.ORCID,Furukawa Toshi A.ORCID,Efthimiou OrestisORCID,Perlis MichaelORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundChronic insomnia disorder is highly prevalent, disabling and costly. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is recommended as the first-line treatment. CBT-I may contain various educational, cognitive and behavioural strategies delivered in a range of formats, but the effect of each component remains unclear.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and component network meta-analysis (cNMA) of CBT-I trials for chronic insomnia. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, PsycINFO and ICTRP for randomised controlled trials published from database inception to 14thMay 2022, comparing any form of CBT-I against each other or a control condition for chronic insomnia disorder in adults (aged ≥18 years). We included insomnia both with and without comorbidities. Concomitant treatments were allowed if they were equally distributed among the arms. Two independent reviewers identified components, extracted data, and assessed trial quality. Primary outcome of interest in this study was treatment efficacy (remission defined as reaching a satisfactory state at endpoint measured by any validated self-reported scale) at post-treatment. (PROSPERO; CRD42022324233)FindingsWe identified 226 trials, including 29,982 participants. Mean age was 45·7 years and 71% were women. The results suggests that critical components of CBT-I are cognitive restructuring (incremental odds ratio[iOR] 1·63 [95% confidence interval 1·25 to 2·14]), sleep restriction (iOR 1·44 [1·00 to 2·06]) and stimulus control (iOR 1·44 [1·00 to 2·07]) Sleep hygiene education was not essential (iOR 1·05 [0·79 to 1·38]) and relaxation procedures may be counterproductive (iOR 0·81 [0·64 to 1·03]). Face-to-face, therapist-led program was found to be most beneficial (iOR 1·86 [1·21to 2·85]). The overall risk of bias was low in 8% of the trials, some concerns in 56%, and high in 36%.InterpretationThis cNMA suggests that effective and efficient CBT-I packages can include cognitive restructuring, sleep restriction and stimulus control, but not relaxation.FundingNone.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3