Abstract
AbstractIntroductionHealth technology assessment (HTA) is an area that remains less implemented in low- and lower middle-income countries. The aim of the study is to understand the perceptions of stakeholders in Uganda towards HTA and its role in decision making, in order to inform its potential implementation in the country.MethodsThe study takes a cross-sectional mixed methods approach, utilising an adapted version of an International Decision Support Initiative questionnaire with both semi-structured and open-ended questions. We interviewed thirty key informants from different stakeholder institutions in Uganda that have decision making roles in the health sector.ResultsAll participants perceived HTA as an important tool for decision making. Allocative efficiency was regarded as the most important use of HTA receiving the highest average score (8.8 out of 10), followed by quality of healthcare (7.8/10), transparency (7.6/10), budget control (7.5/10) and equity (6.5/10). There was concern that some of the uses of HTA may not be achieved in reality if there was political interference during the HTA process. The technology areas that interviewees highlighted as needing HTA type evaluations urgently were identified as medicines (60.0% of the participants), diagnostics (53.3%), vaccines (40.0%), and public health programs (26.7%). The study participants identified development partners as the most likely potential users of HTA (66.7% of participants), followed by Ministry of Health (43.3%).ConclusionInterviewed stakeholders in Uganda viewed the role of HTA positively, suggesting that there exists a promising environment for the establishment and operationalisation of HTA as a tool for decision making within the health sector. However, sustainable development and application of HTA in Uganda will require adequate capacity both to undertake HTAs and to support their use and uptake.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference45 articles.
1. WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage. Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage.; 2014. Accessed September 2, 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25666865
2. World Health Organisation. Universal health coverage (UHC). Published April 1, 2021. Accessed June 12, 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/universal-health-coverage-(uhc)
3. Tran Van Tien by, Thi Phuong H , Mathauer I , Thi Kim Phuong N. A Health Financing Review of Vietnam with a Focus on Social Health Insurance: Bottlenecks in Institutional Design and Organizational Practice of Health Financing and Options to Accelerate Progress towards Universal Coverage.; 2011.
4. China’s universal healthcare reform: the first phase [2009–2011] of the ambitious plan
5. Healthcare Financing Reforms: Ghana’s National Health Insurance
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献