Empiric treatment with aspirin and ticagrelor is the most cost-effective strategy in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPatients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are often treated with dual antiplatelet therapy regimens as part of secondary stroke prevention. Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet used in these regimens, is metabolised into its active form by theCYP2C19enzyme. Patients with loss of function (LOF) mutations inCYP2C19are at risk for poorer secondary outcomes when prescribed clopidogrel. We aimed to determine the cost effectiveness of three different treatment antiplatelet regimens in ischemic stroke populations with minor strokes or TIAs and how these treatment regimens are influenced by the LOF prevalence in the population.MethodsMarkov models were developed to look at the cost effectiveness of empiric treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel versus empiric treatment with aspirin and ticagrelor, versus genotype guided therapy for either 21 or 30 days. Effect ratios were obtained from the literature and incidence rates and costs were obtained from the national data published by the Singapore Ministry of Health. The primary endpoints were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).ResultsEmpiric treatment with aspirin and ticagrelor was the most cost-effective treatment regimen if the prevalence of LOF was below 7.5%. Genotype guided therapy was more cost effective than empiric aspirin and clopidogrel if the LOF was above 65.5%. Empiric ticagrelor and aspirin was cost saving when compared to genotype guided therapy. Results in models of dual antiplatelet therapy for 30 days were similar.ConclusionThis study suggests that in patients with minor stroke and TIA planned for dual antiplatelet regimens, empiric ticagrelor and aspirin is the most cost-effective treatment regimen. If ticagrelor is not available, genotype guided therapy is the most cost-effective treatment regimen if the LOF prevalence in the population is more than 65.5%.Clinical PerspectiveWhat is new?We show that empiricial ticagrelor and aspirin is the most cost-effective treatment strategy in patients with minor stroke and transient ischemic attackWhat are the clinical implications?In patients with minor stroke/ transient ischemic attack, it may not be necessary to screen forCYP2C19status as empirical ticagrelor and aspirin is cost effective.