Comparing mental imagery experiences across visual, auditory, and other sensory modalities

Author:

Sulfaro Alexander AORCID,Robinson Amanda KORCID,Carlson Thomas AORCID

Abstract

AbstractAlthough mental imagery is often studied as a visual phenomenon, it can occur in any sensory modality. Given that mental images may recruit similar modality-specific neural systems to those which support veridical perception, the properties of mental images may be constrained by the modality in which they are experienced. Yet, little is known about how mental images are experienced at all, let alone how such experiences may vary depending on the modality in which they occur. Here we explored how mental images are experienced in different modalities using an extensive questionnaire. Mainly focusing on visual and auditory mental imagery, we surveyed participants on if and how they experienced their thought content in a sensory way when thinking about the appearance or sound of the letter “O”. Specifically, we investigated temporal properties of imagined content (e.g. onset latency, duration), as well as spatial properties (e.g. apparent location), effort (e.g. ease, spontaneity, control), dependence on body movements (e.g. eye movements), interactions between real and imagined content (e.g. inner speech during reading), the perceived normality of imagery experiences, and how participants labeled their own experiences. Participants also ranked their mental imagery experiences in the five traditional sensory modalities and reported on the involvement of each modality during their thoughts, imagination, and dreams. Confidence ratings were taken for every answer recorded. Overall, visual and auditory experiences tended to dominate mental events relative to other sensory modalities. However, most people reported that auditory mental imagery was superior to visual mental imagery on almost every metric tested, except with respect to spatial properties. Our findings suggest that mental images are restrained in a similar matter to other modality-specific sensory processes in the brain. Broadly, our work also provides a wealth of insights and observations into how mental images are experienced by individuals, acting as a useful resource for future investigations.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3