What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data: a cross-sectional survey

Author:

Hamilton Daniel G.ORCID,Everitt Sarah,Page Matthew J.ORCID,Fidler FionaORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo characterise the attitudes of Australians affected by cancer towards the sharing of de-identified research data with third parties, including the public.Design, setting, participantsAnonymous online survey between October 2022 and February 2023 of adult Australians previously diagnosed with cancer.Main outcome measuresSelf-reported attitudes towards the sharing of human and non-human data, and the hypothetical sharing of their anonymised medical information and responses to the survey.Results551 respondents contributed data to the survey. There was strong support for cancer researchers sharing non-human and de-identified human research data with medical doctors (90% and 95% respectively) and non-profit researchers (both 94%). However, this declined when participants were asked whether data should be shared with for-profit researchers (both 64%) or posted publicly (both 61%). When asked if they would hypothetically consent to researchers at their treatment location collecting and sharing their de-identified data publicly, only half agreed (50%). In contrast, after being shown a visual representation of the de-identified survey data, 80% of respondents supported sharing it publicly. A further 10% also supported public sharing of some of the survey data, with the most frequently desired information to be withheld including education history and levels of trust in healthcare stakeholders.ConclusionsAustralians affected by cancer support the sharing of research data, particularly with clinician and non-profit researchers. Visualisation of the data to be shared may also enhance support for making research data publicly available. These results should help alleviate any concerns about research participants’ attitudes on data sharing, as well as boost researchers’ motivation for sharing.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference25 articles.

1. Foley C. How the United Nations’ new ‘open science framework’ could speed up the pace of discovery. The Conversation, 2021. December 4th, 2021. https://theconversation.com/how-the-united-nations-new-open-science-framework-could-speed-up-the-pace-of-discovery-173148. [Last accessed: February 27th, 2023.]

2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). NHMRC’s revised Open Access Policy released. September 20th, 2022. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/news-centre/nhmrcs-revised-open-access-policy-released. [Last accessed: March 8th, 2023.]

3. Research Australia. Public Opinion Poll on Health and Medical Research & Innovation. December 9th, 2020. https://issuu.com/researchaustralia/docs/2020_opinion_poll_report_final. [Last accessed: March 8th, 2023.]

4. Attitudes of Australian breast cancer patients toward the secondary use of administrative and clinical trial data

5. Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3