Abstract
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted global supply chain
shortcomings in the US hospital delivery system, most notably personal
protective equipment (PPE) and COVID-19 is found on these masks ∼7 days. Recent
work from our group has shown two promising disinfection methods for N95 facial
masks, dry heat (hot air (75 °C, 30 min) and UVGI which is UVGI 254 nm, 8W, 30
min. Using N95 five models of N95 masks from three different manufacturers we
determined the following: 1) Hot air treated N95 masks applied over 5 cycles did
not degrade the fit of masks (1.5% change in fit factor, p = .67), 2) UVGI
treated N95 masks applied over 10 cycles were significantly degraded in fit and
did not pass quantitative fit testing using OSHA testing protocols on a human
model (−77.4% change in fit factor, p = .0002).
NOTE
We would like to share our results with the community as
soon as possible. Be mindful that this report is a pilot study and a
work in progress. We will have more results in the coming days and
weeks.
We recommend that hospital
policy and
procedures be respected
and adhered to. Do not use anything in your home to disinfect contaminated
equipment. Please do not heat your masks in a home oven!
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference17 articles.
1. Evaluation of multiple (3-Cycle) decontamination processing for filtering facepiece respirators;Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics,2010
2. Transfer of bacteriophage MS2 and fluorescein from N95 filtering facepiece respirators to hands: Measuring fomite potential
3. CDC. Interim Infection Prevention and Control
Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings.
4. Administration, O. S. and H. Appendix A to §1910.134—Fit
Testing Procedures (Mandatory).
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献