Measuring the quality of scientific references in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800,000 scientific articles

Abstract

AbstractWikipedia is a widely used online reference work which cites hundreds of thousands of scientific articles across its entries. The quality of these citations has not been previously measured, and such measurements have a bearing on the reliability and quality of the scientific portions of this reference work. Using a novel technique, a massive database of qualitatively described citations, and machine learning algorithms, we analyzed 1,923,575 Wikipedia articles which cited a total of 824,298 scientific articles, and found that most scientific articles (57%) are uncited or untested by subsequent studies, while the remainder show a wide variability in contradicting or supporting evidence (2-41%). Additionally, we analyzed 51,804,643 scientific articles from journals indexed in the Web of Science and found that most (85%) were uncited or untested by subsequent studies, while the remainder show a wide variability in contradicting or supporting evidence (1-14%).