Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundIn clinical practice, EEGs are assessed visually. For practical reasons, recordings often need to be performed with a reduced number of electrodes and artifacts make assessment difficult. To circumvent these obstacles, different interpolation techniques can be utilized. These techniques usually perform better for higher electrode densities and values interpolated at areas far from electrodes can be unreliable. Using a method that learns the statistical distribution of the cortical electrical fields and predicts values may yield better results.New MethodGenerative networks based on convolutional layers were trained to upsample from 4 or 14 channels or to dynamically restore single missing channels to recreate 21 channel EEGs. 5,144 hours of data from 1,385 subjects of the Temple University Hospital EEG database were used for training and evaluating the networks.Comparison with Existing MethodThe results were compared to spherical spline interpolation. Several statistical measures were used as well as a visual evaluation by board certified clinical neurophysiologists. Overall, the generative networks performed significantly better. There was no difference between real and network generated data in the number of examples assessed as artificial by experienced EEG interpreters whereas for data generated by interpolation, the number was significantly higher. In addition, network performance improved with increasing number of included subjects, with the greatest effect seen in the range 5 – 100 subjects.ConclusionsUsing neural networks to restore or upsample EEG signals is a viable alternative to interpolation methods.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference40 articles.
1. Automated EEG analysis of epilepsy: A review;Knowledge-Based Systems,2013
2. Aznan NKN , Atapour-Abarghouei A , Bonner S , Connoly JD , Al Moubayed N , Breckon T. Simulating brain signals: creating synthetic EEG data via neural-based generative models for improved SSVEP classification. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2019.
3. Corley I , Huang Y. Deep EEG super-resolution: Upsampling EEG spatial resolution with generative adversarial networks. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics 2019; 100–103.
4. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis
5. Eiter T , Mannila H. Computing discrete Fréchet distance, Vienna, Austria: Tech. Report CD-TR 94/64 Christian Doppler Laboratory for Expert Systems 1994.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献