REACT-1 round 11 report: low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community prior to the third step of the English roadmap out of lockdown

Author:

Riley Steven,Haw DavidORCID,Walters Caroline E.ORCID,Wang HaoweiORCID,Eales OliverORCID,Ainslie Kylie E. C.ORCID,Atchison ChristinaORCID,Fronterre Claudio,Diggle Peter J.ORCID,Page Andrew J.ORCID,Trotter Alexander J.,Le Viet Thanh,Alikhan Nabil-FareedORCID,O’Grady JustinORCID,Ashby DeborahORCID,Donnelly Christl A.ORCID,Cooke GrahamORCID,Barclay WendyORCID,Ward HelenORCID,Darzi AraORCID,Elliott PaulORCID,

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNational epidemic dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infections are being driven by: the degree of recent indoor mixing (both social and workplace), vaccine coverage, intrinsic properties of the circulating lineages, and prior history of infection (via natural immunity). In England, infections, hospitalisations and deaths fell during the first two steps of the “roadmap” for exiting the third national lockdown. The third step of the roadmap in England takes place on 17 May 2021.MethodsWe report the most recent findings on community infections from the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study in which a swab is obtained from a representative cross-sectional sample of the population in England and tested using PCR. Round 11 of REACT-1 commenced self-administered swab-collection on 15 April 2021 and completed collections on 3 May 2021. We compare the results of REACT-1 round 11 to round 10, in which swabs were collected from 11 to 30 March 2021.ResultsBetween rounds 10 and 11, prevalence of swab-positivity dropped by 50% in England from 0.20% (0.17%, 0.23%) to 0.10% (0.08%, 0.13%), with a corresponding R estimate of 0.90 (0.87, 0.94). Rates of swab-positivity fell in the 55 to 64 year old group from 0.17% (0.12%, 0.25%) in round 10 to 0.06% (0.04%, 0.11%) in round 11. Prevalence in round 11 was higher in the 25 to 34 year old group at 0.21% (0.12%, 0.38%) than in the 55 to 64 year olds and also higher in participants of Asian ethnicity at 0.31% (0.16%, 0.60%) compared with white participants at 0.09% (0.07%, 0.11%). Based on sequence data for positive samples for which a lineage could be identified, we estimate that 92.3% (75.9%, 97.9%, n=24) of infections were from the B.1.1.7 lineage compared to 7.7% (2.1%, 24.1%, n=2) from the B.1.617.2 lineage. Both samples from the B.1.617.2 lineage were detected in London from participants not reporting travel in the previous two weeks. Also, allowing for suitable lag periods, the prior close alignment between prevalence of infections and hospitalisations and deaths nationally has diverged.DiscussionWe observed marked reductions in prevalence from March to April and early May 2021 in England reflecting the success of the vaccination programme and despite easing of restrictions during lockdown. However, there is potential upwards pressure on prevalence from the further easing of lockdown regulations and presence of the B.1.617.2 lineage. If prevalence rises in the coming weeks, policy-makers will need to assess the possible impact on hospitalisations and deaths. In addition, consideration should be given to other health and economic impacts if increased levels of community transmission occur.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference19 articles.

1. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). In: Our World in Data [Internet]. [cited 6 Apr 2021]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/

2. Will India’s devastating COVID-19 surge provide data that clear up its death “paradox”? Science. 2021 [cited 10 May 2021]. Available: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/04/will-india-s-devastating-covid-19-surge-provi de-data-clear-its-death-paradox

3. SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among unvaccinated is negatively associated with community-level vaccination rates

4. UK Government. UK government Covid-19 dashboard. In: UK government Covid-19 dashboard [Internet]. Available: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

5. Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3