Physical activity promotion is lacking in local treatment protocols for patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction: A cross-sectional study

Author:

van Oorsouw R.ORCID,Koenders N.ORCID,Seeger J.P.ORCID,Hoogeboom T.J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo describe the content and methodological quality of local physiotherapy and nursing treatment protocols specifically regarding physical activity promotion in patients hospitalised with myocardial infarction.DesignCross-sectional study comprising the analysis of 18 physiotherapy and 14 nursing protocols.SettingProtocols from twenty Dutch hospitals were used.Main outcome measuresData were extracted from protocols for patients hospitalised with myocardial infarction according to a standardized data-extraction procedure. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the content of protocols, in specific, treatment goals, interventions, clinimetrics and discharge criteria. Methodological quality of the protocols was examined using the AGREE-II tool.ResultsTherapeutic goals concerning physical activity were described in 83% of the physiotherapy protocols and in 7% of the nursing protocols. Therapeutic interventions concerning physical activity were described in 100% of the physiotherapy protocols and in 57% of the nursing protocols. Two (14%) of the fourteen interventions described in the physiotherapy protocols and none in the nursing protocols, were interpreted as physical activity promotion. All protocols were rated as having low methodological quality, mainly due to a lack of supporting scientific evidence. The overall quality was rated with an average score of 3 out of 7 (range: 1-5).ConclusionsPhysiotherapy and nursing protocols for hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction are primarily aimed at physical activity under supervision, rather than physical activity promotion. Our work provides physiotherapists and nurses insights in how to further improve the content and methodological quality of their local treatment protocols for patients hospitalised with myocardial infarction.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3