Author:
Bolk Kody G.,Dunham Michael E.,Hoffseth Kevin F.,Jung Jangwook P,Garcia Beatriz M.,Walvekar Rohan R.
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveDetermine the effectiveness of evacuation systems designed to clear bioaerosols and smoke from the surgical field.Study designHigh-speed photographic evaluation of aerosol and smoke generated in simulated surgical fields.Materials and methodsSurgical site aerosol clearance was evaluated using a model of the anterior neck and prototypes for surgical site evacuator ports created using 3D printing. A commercially available electrocautery handpiece fitted with an evacuator was tested on animal tissue for smoke clearance. Both systems were connected to a commercial vacuum powered evacuation system. High speed photography was used to record videos of the aerosols and plumes. Fields were recorded with and without evacuation.ResultsEfficient aerosol clearance from an open surgical field using an evacuator port is dependent upon the port design, airflow velocity, and placement relative to the aerosol generating site. The size and surface geometry of the surgical field are also important.Surgical smoke generated with electrocautery is cleared from the field by the evacuation enclosure around the handpiece, even at high electrocautery power settings. Except for device noise, there appears to be no reason for using evacuator flow rates below the maximum setting.ConclusionsBioaerosol and smoke generated during surgery are potential sources of respiratory pathogens and pose a threat to operating room personnel. Surgical site evacuation can significantly reduce the volume of airborne particles in the field but requires careful design and deployment considerations.x
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference20 articles.
1. Center for Disease Control: Interim U.S. Guidance for Risk Assessment and Public Health Management of Healthcare Personnel with Potential Exposure in a Healthcare Setting to Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/guidance-risk-assesment-hcp.html. Accessed May 10, 2020.
2. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples
3. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients
4. Safety considerations for operating room personnel during hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion
5. Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris