Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo estimate occupational differences in COVID-19 mortality, and test whether these are confounded by factors, such as regional differences, ethnicity and education or due to non-workplace factors, such as deprivation or pre-pandemic health.DesignRetrospective cohort studySettingPeople living in private households EnglandParticipants14,295,900 people aged 40-64 years (mean age 52 years, 51% female) who were alive on 24 January 2020, living in private households in England in 2019, were employed in 2011, and completed the 2011 census.Main outcome measuresCOVID-19 related death, assessed between 24 January 2020 and 28 December 2020. We estimated age-standardised mortality rates per 100,000 person-years at risk (ASMR) stratified by sex and occupations. To estimate the effect of occupation due to work-related exposures, we used Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for confounding (region, ethnicity, education), as well as non-workplace factors that are related to occupation.ResultsThere is wide variation between occupations in COVID-19 mortality. Several occupations, particularly those involving contact with patients or the public, show three-fold or four-fold risks. These elevated risks were greatly attenuated after adjustment for confounding and mediating non-workplace factors. For example, the hazard ratio (HR) for men working as taxi and cab drivers or chauffeurs changed from 4.60 [95%CI 3.62-5.84] to 1.47 [1.14-1.89] after adjustment. More generally, the overall HR for men working in essential occupations compared with men in non-essential occupations changed from 1.45 [1.34 - 1.56] to 1.22 [1.13 - 1.32] after adjustment. For most occupations, confounding and other mediating factors explained about 70% to 80% of the age-adjusted hazard ratios.ConclusionsWorking conditions are likely to play a role in COVID-19 mortality, particularly in occupations involving contact with COVID-19 patients or the public. However, there is also a substantial contribution from non-workplace factors, including regional factors, socio-demographic factors, and pre-pandemic health.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference17 articles.
1. ONS, “Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional: week ending 5 February 2021,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending5february2021.
2. ONS, Coronavirus (COVID-19) related deaths by occupation, England and Wales: deaths registered up to and including 20 April 2020, 2020.
3. M. Mutambudzi , C. Niedwiedz , E. B. Macdonald , A. Leyland , F. Mair , J. Anderson , C. Celis-Morales , J. Cleland , J. Forbes , J. Gill , C. Hastie , F. Ho , B. Jani , D. F. Mackay , B. Nicholl , C. O’Donnell , N. Sattar , P. Welsh , J. P. Pell , S. V. Katikireddi and E. Demou , “Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants,” Occup Environ Med, 2020.
4. ONS, Coronavirus (COVID-19) related deaths by occupation, England and Wales: deaths registered between 9 March and 28 December 2020, 2021.
5. D. Hawkins , L. Davis and D. Kriebel , “COVID‐19 deaths by occupation, Massachusetts, March 1–July 31, 2020,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2021.