Abstract
ABSTRACTDensity-dependent selection, especially together with r-K trade-offs, has been one of the most plausible suggested mechanisms for the evolution of population stability. However, experimental support for this explanation has been both meagre and mixed. One study with Drosophila melanogaster yielded no evidence for populations adapted to chronic larval crowding having also evolved greater population stability. Another study, on D. ananassae, suggested that populations adapted to larval crowding evolved both greater constancy and persistence stability, and the data also suggested an r-K trade-off in those populations, though the evidence for the latter was not conclusive. Moreover, theoretical work suggested that density-dependent selection could result in the evolution of greater population stability, even in the absence of an r-K trade-off. Here, we show that populations of D. melanogaster, selected for adaptation to larval crowding at very low food amounts per vial, evolve enhanced constancy and persistence stability. The enhanced population stability in the crowding-adapted populations seems to have evolved through the increased equlibrium size (K) and reduced sensitivity of realized population growth rates to density (α).There was no clear evidence for reduced intrinsic population growth rate (r) in the more stable crowding-adapted populations. Our study adds to the growing evidence in support of the hypothesis that population stability can evolve in response to density-dependent selection through the evolution of certain life-history traits that are associated with higher K and less negative α. We discuss our results in the light of previous work, and suggest that a model-free framework might be of great heuristic value in understanding the evolution of population stability through changes in the density-sensitivity of life-history traits, whether or not these changes result from density-dependent selection.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory