Proposal and extensive test of a calibration protocol for crop phenology models

Author:

Wallach Daniel,Palosuo Taru,Thorburn Peter,Mielenz Henrike,Buis Samuel,Hochman Zvi,Gourdain Emmanuelle,Andrianasolo Fety,Dumont Benjamin,Ferrise Roberto,Gaiser Thomas,Garcia Cecile,Gayler Sebastian,Harrison Matthew,Hiremath Santosh,Horan Heidi,Hoogenboom Gerrit,Jansson Per-Erik,Jing Qi,Justes Eric,Kersebaum Kurt-Christian,Launay Marie,Lewan Elisabet,Liu Ke,Mequanint Fasil,Moriondo Marco,Nendel Claas,Padovan Gloria,Qian Budong,Schütze Niels,Seserman Diana-Maria,Shelia Vakhtang,Souissi Amir,Specka Xenia,Srivastava Amit Kumar,Trombi Giacomo,Weber Tobias K.D.,Weihermüller Lutz,Wöhling Thomas,Seidel Sabine J.

Abstract

AbstractA major effect of environment on crops is through crop phenology, and therefore, the capacity to predict phenology for new environments is important. Mechanistic crop models are a major tool for such predictions, but calibration of crop phenology models is difficult and there is no consensus on the best approach. Here we propose an original, detailed approach, a protocol, for calibration of such models. The protocol covers all the steps in the calibration work-flow, namely choice of default parameter values, choice of objective function, choice of parameters to estimate from the data, calculation of optimal parameter values and diagnostics. The major innovation is in the choice of which parameters to estimate from the data, which combines expert knowledge and data-based model selection. First, almost additive parameters are identified and estimated. This should make bias (average difference between observed and simulated values) nearly zero. These are “obligatory” parameters, that will definitely be estimated. Then candidate parameters are identified, which are parameters likely to explain the remaining discrepancies between simulated and observed values. A candidate is only added to the list of parameters to estimate if it leads to a reduction in BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion), which is a model selection criterion. A second original aspect of the protocol is the specification of documentation for each stage of the protocol. The protocol was applied by 19 modeling teams to three data sets for wheat phenology. All teams first calibrated their model using their “usual” calibration approach, so it was possible to compare usual and protocol calibration. Evaluation of prediction error was based on data from sites and years not represented in the training data. Compared to usual calibration, calibration following the new protocol reduced the variability between modeling teams by 22% and significantly reduced prediction error.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference38 articles.

1. Ahuja LR , Ma L (eds) (2011) Methods of Introducing System Models into Agricultural Research. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA

2. Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change

3. Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

4. How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?

5. An overview of the crop model stics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3