Nanopore-only assemblies for genomic surveillance of the global priority drug-resistant pathogen, Klebsiella pneumoniae

Abstract

BackgroundOxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing has rich potential for genomic epidemiology and public health investigations of bacterial pathogens, particularly in low-resource settings and at the point of care, due to its portability and affordability. However, low base-call accuracy has limited the reliability of ONT data for critical tasks such as antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and virulence gene detection and typing, serotype prediction and cluster identification. Thus, Illumina sequencing remains the standard for genomic surveillance despite higher capital and running costs.MethodsWe tested the accuracy of ONT-only assemblies for common applied bacterial genomics tasks (genotyping and cluster detection, implemented via Kleborate, Kaptive and Pathogenwatch), using data from 54 unique Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. ONT reads generated via MinION with R9.4 flowcells were basecalled using three alternative models (Fast, High-accuracy (HAC) and Super-accuracy (SUP), available within ONT’s Guppy software), assembled with Flye and polished using Medaka. Accuracy of typing using ONT-only assemblies was compared with that of Illumina-only and hybrid ONT+Illumina assemblies, constructed from the same isolates as reference standards.ResultsThe most resource-intensive ONT-assembly approach (SUP basecalling, with or without Medaka polishing) performed best, yielding reliable capsule (K) type calls for all strains (100% exact or best matching locus), reliable multi-locus sequence type (MLST) assignment (98.3% exact match or single-locus variants), and good detection of acquired AMR genes and mutations (88% – 100% correct identification across the various drug classes). Distance-based trees generated from SUP+Medaka assemblies accurately reflected overall genetic relationships between isolates; however, the definition of outbreak clusters from ONT-only assemblies was problematic. HAC basecalling + Medaka polishing performed similarly to SUP basecalling without polishing, and polishing introduced errors into HAC- or Fast-basecalled assemblies. Therefore, we recommend investing compute resources into basecalling (SUP model) over polishing, where compute resources and/or time are limiting.ConclusionsOverall, our results show that MLST, K type and AMR determinants can be reliably identified with ONT-only data. However, cluster detection remains challenging with this technology.