Responsiveness of functional assessments to monitor change in balance, walking speed and strength of older adults: A systematic review of the minimal detectable change

Author:

Arkesteijn MarcoORCID,Low Daniel

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe objective of this paper is to systematically review and evaluate the responsiveness of different functional tests via the minimal detectable change (MDC) across different older adult population cohorts.DesignSystematic review of ISI Web of Knowledge and PubMed databases were searched up to September 26th 2020.SettingCommunity dwellings, hospital and residential homesParticipantsStudies were included if participants were adults over the age of 60. This study reports data from studies that utilise healthy community dwelling older adults, as well as older adults who are hospitalised, live in residential home or have musculoskeletal conditions.InterventionsNo interventions feature in this studyPrimary and secondary outcome measuresMDC reported for gait speed, grip strength, balance, timed up and go, and repeated chair stand separated per older adult sub-group were deemed the primary outcome measure. A secondary outcome measure were the results of a regression analysis, performed to determine the effect of the functional test, cohort, study design and MDC calculation methodology on MDC magnitude.ResultsThirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Not all assessments were evaluated in the literature for all population cohorts. The MDC was affected by the functional test used, the cohort and MDC calculation methodology.ConclusionThe MDC can be assessment and population specific, and thus this should be taken into account when using the MDC. It appears acceptable that different assessors are involved in the re-assessment of the same person.Trial registrationThe systematic review protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42019147527).Article SummaryStrengths and Limitations of this StudyStrength: A range of assessments were included to determine if MDC could be used to prioritize specific assessments in interventions.Strength: A wide range of search criteria and methods resulting in 6448 studies being assessed that enabled the inclusion of 39 original research papers to derive 138 MDC values.Strength: Analysis of MDC95 for functional tests commonly used by practitioners to assess effective change in older adultsStrength: Analyses of the impact of method design features such as different assessors on the MDCLimitation: Limited to the settings and tests selected

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3