A lack of distinct cell identities in single-cell measurements: revisiting Waddington’s landscape

Author:

Sparta Breanne,Hamilton Timothy,Hughes Serena,Deeds Eric J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractA prevailing interpretation of Waddington’s landscape is that distinct cell types with distinct physiologies are produced and stabilized by dynamical attractors in gene expression space. This notion is often applied in the analysis of single-cell omics data, where cells are clustered into groups that represent cell types, prior to downstream analyses like differential gene expression. Until the advent of single-cell measurement technologies, however, it has been impossible to characterize the heterogeneity of cells in the neighborhoods of these attractor states. In this work, we apply graph theory to characterize the distribution of cells in epigenetic space, using data from various tissues and organisms as well as various single-cell omics technologies. Rather than finding distinct clusters of cells that map cell types to specific regions of epigenetic space, we found that cells of very distinct types and lineages occupy the same region of space. Further, we found that the density distribution of cells is approximately power-law, with most cells existing in low-density regions, very far from other cells. This highly heterogeneous density distribution is unexpected, as it is not consistent with the distributions we would expect to see in the neighborhood of an attractor. We found these two observations are universal in single-cell data on epigenetic state of multicellular organisms, regardless of the tissue, organism, measurement technique employed, or the approach used to select the subset of genes on which the analysis was performed. The fact that currently-available single-cell data is inconsistent with the predictions of Waddington’s landscape poses a challenge both for the robust analysis of these data and for our overall understanding of epigenesis in development.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3