What matters to families about the healthcare of preterm or low birth weight infants: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Author:

Hurt LisaORCID,Odd DavidORCID,Mann MalaORCID,Beetham HannahORCID,Dorgeat EmmaORCID,Isaac Thomas CWORCID,Ashman AnnieORCID,Wood FionaORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundPreterm and low birth weight (LBW) infants have complex healthcare needs. In this qualitative evidence synthesis, we aimed to understand what matters to families about the healthcare provided from birth to preterm or LBW infants, to inform appropriate planning and delivery of care.MethodsWe searched nine databases and the reference lists of included studies to identify eligible studies that used qualitative methods to examine the views of families relating to healthcare for preterm or LBW infants. Studies in all countries (low, middle, and high-income) and healthcare settings (home, community, primary, secondary and tertiary care) were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies. The GRADE-CERQual approach was used to assess confidence in each review finding. Thematic synthesis techniques were used for analysis.Results203 studies (in 208 papers) were eligible for inclusion. 49 studies (in 51 papers) from 25 countries were sampled for the analysis, based on pre-specified criteria (methodological quality; data richness; and ensuring representation across continents and from settings with varying resources). Eight analytical themes were identified. What mattered to carers was: a positive outcome for the child; active involvement in care; support to cope at home after discharge; emotional support for the family; the healthcare environment; information needs were met; logistical support was available; and positive relationships with staff. Confidence in most results was high to moderate.ConclusionWe found high consistency in what matters to families regardless of location or resources, even though carers reported a variety of experiences in the care of their preterm or LBW infant. Families views on care in neonatal units have been extensively studied. Further research is needed on what matters to fathers and other family members, and to families receiving community-based care especially in low and middle-income countries.What is already known on this topicPreterm and low birthweight births are a major cause of poor health globally.Despite advances in neonatal care, preterm and low birthweight infants often require complex and prolonged medical intervention, with survivors at increased risk of lifelong disability and poor quality of life.What this study addsCarers have strong views about what matters in relation to the healthcare provided to preterm and low birthweight infants, and these are remarkably consistent across different countries and healthcare settings.What matters to carers is a positive outcome for the child; active involvement in care; support to cope at home after discharge; emotional support for the family; the healthcare environment; information needs are met; logistical support is available; and positive relationships with staff.How this study might affect research, practice or policyIt is vital that international and local organisations working to ensure high-quality and equitable care for small and sick newborns worldwide understand what matters to families.Further research is needed on the views of fathers and other family members, and on families receiving community-based care especially in low and middle-income countries.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3