On the similarities of representations in artificial and brain neural networks for speech recognition

Abstract

AbstractHow the human brain supports speech comprehension is an important question in neuroscience. Studying the neurocomputational mechanisms underlying human language is not only critical to understand and develop treatments for many human conditions that impair language and communication but also to inform artificial systems that aim to automatically process and identify natural speech. In recent years, intelligent machines powered by deep learning have achieved near human level of performance in speech recognition. The fields of artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience have finally reached a similar phenotypical level despite of their huge differences in implementation, and so deep learning models can—in principle—serve as candidates for mechanistic models of the human auditory system. Utilizing high-performance automatic speech recognition systems, and advanced noninvasive human neuroimaging technology such as magnetoencephalography and multivariate pattern-information analysis, the current study aimed to relate machine-learned representations of speech to recorded human brain representations of the same speech. In one direction, we found a quasi-hierarchical functional organisation in human auditory cortex qualitatively matched with the hidden layers of deep neural networks trained in an automatic speech recognizer. In the reverse direction, we modified the hidden layer organization of the artificial neural network based on neural activation patterns in human brains. The result was a substantial improvement in word recognition accuracy and learned speech representations. We have demonstrated that artificial and brain neural networks can be mutually informative in the domain of speech recognition.Author summaryThe human capacity to recognize individual words from the sound of speech is a cornerstone of our ability to communicate with one another, yet the processes and representations underlying it remain largely unknown. Software systems for automatic speech-to-text provide a plausible model for how speech recognition can be performed. In this study, we used an automatic speech recogniser model to probe recordings from the brains of participants who listened to speech. We found that the parts of the dynamic, evolving representations inside the machine system were a good fit for representations found in the brain recordings, both showing similar hierarchical organisations. Then, we observed where the machine’s representations diverged from the brain’s, and made experimental adjustments to the automatic recognizer’s design so that its representations might better fit the brain’s. In so doing, we substantially improved the recognizer’s ability to accurately identify words.