Abstract
AbstractBackdriveable actuators with energy regeneration can improve the efficiency and extend the battery-powered operating times of robotic lower-limb exoskeletons by converting some of the otherwise dissipated energy during negative mechanical work into electrical energy. However, previous related studies have focused on steady-state level-ground walking. To better encompass real-world community mobility, here we developed a feedforward human-exoskeleton energy regeneration system model to simulate energy regeneration and storage during other daily locomotor activities. Data from inverse dynamics analyses of 10 healthy young adults walking at variable speeds and slopes were used to calculate the negative joint mechanical power and work (i.e., the mechanical energy theoretically available for electrical energy regeneration). These human joint mechanical energetics were then used to simulate backdriving a robotic exoskeleton and regenerating energy. An empirical characterization of the exoskeleton device was carried out using a joint dynamometer system and an electromechanical motor model to calculate the actuator efficiency and to simulate energy regeneration. Our performance calculations showed that regenerating energy at slower walking speeds and decline slopes could significantly extend the battery-powered operating times of robotic lower-limb exoskeletons (i.e., up to 99% increase in total number of steps), therein improving locomotor efficiency.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference25 articles.
1. State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons;IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng,2017
2. Compact gearboxes for modern robotics: A review;Front. Robot. AI,2020
3. An overview on principles for energy efficient robot locomotion;Front. Robot. AI,2018
4. Design principles for energy-efficient legged locomotion and implementation on the MIT cheetah robot;IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron,2015
5. J. Hollerbach , I. Hunter , and J. Ballantyne , “A comparative analysis of actuator technologies for robotics,” in The Robotics Review 2, 1992, pp. 299–342.